Dunlop FX Pro Lite
About the Dunlop FX Pro Lite
The FX Pro Lite carries the same diamond head as the FX Pro but sheds roughly 10–20g, and reviewers describe its balance as sitting low to medium rather than the FX Pro's high, head-heavy setup. In practice that moves the sweet spot closer to the handle, making the racket quicker to bring back into position for defensive volleys and fast exchanges at the net, at some cost to the flat-out smash power the FX Pro is built for.
Its core is described as a medium-soft EVA (Dunlop lists it as a "half-soft" touch), softer than the Pro EVA core in the FX Pro, which gives a more forgiving, comfortable strike and suits players who build points through control and placement rather than committing to every ball at maximum pace. Players who mainly want power off the back wall and are comfortable with a heavier, head-heavy frame are better served by the FX Pro; players who want the FX shape and carbon construction in a racket that is easier to manoeuvre through long rallies are the target for the FX Pro Lite.
Construction is carbon over the EVA core, with a 38mm profile shared across the FX range and a sandpaper-textured face for grip on the ball. Dunlop markets the FX Pro Lite towards advanced players rather than beginners; it is not built as an entry-level or particularly forgiving frame for newer players.
Questions about the Dunlop FX Pro Lite
Who is the Dunlop FX Pro Lite aimed at?
Dunlop pitches it at advanced players who want the FX range's diamond-shaped, carbon-faced attacking profile in a lighter, easier-to-manoeuvre frame than the FX Pro.
Is the Dunlop FX Pro Lite beginner-friendly?
No. It is marketed as an advanced-level racket, and its diamond shape and carbon construction are less forgiving than round-shaped, softer beginner frames.
Is the FX Pro Lite too heavy or demanding to handle?
Not particularly; at 350–360g it is lighter than the FX Pro (370g) and its low-to-medium balance keeps the weight closer to the handle, which makes it easier to reset for defence and fast net exchanges than a head-heavy racket of similar weight.
How does the FX Pro Lite compare to the Dunlop FX Pro?
Both share a diamond head and carbon face, but the FX Pro Lite is lighter (350–360g versus 370g), uses a softer medium-soft EVA core against the FX Pro's firmer Pro EVA, and carries a lower balance, trading some of the FX Pro's flat-out power for manoeuvrability.
What shape and balance does the FX Pro Lite have, and what does that mean in play?
It has a diamond head, which concentrates the sweet spot towards the top of the face for power on clean contact, combined with a low-to-medium balance that keeps the racket quicker to move than a head-heavy diamond frame, so shots slightly off the top of the face still feel controllable.
Is the Dunlop FX Pro Lite control-oriented or power-oriented?
It leans towards control and manoeuvrability for a diamond-shaped racket: the softer core and lower balance point are set up for defensive resets and placement rather than for maximising smash power, which is the FX Pro's job.
Similar rackets from other brands
Matched on shape first, then the rest of the spec sheet — same playing character, different maker.
